Loading...
 
 
 
 
 
 

Choice of Arbitration Rules: The Dilemma

Published: 23 Apr 2003 Average Rating: unrated Print
 

In the midst of such a formidable and intimidating array of legal wisdom and expertise in arbitration, I venture to raise a simple question: by what criteria can a legal adviser, especially an adviser in Africa, decide on which of the arbitration rules to choose for the international commercial contract he is negotiating? The sponsorship of this conference includes at least three of the world's most prestigious institutions administering international commercial arbitration. The oldest of these institutions, the LCIA, has now established a Pan African Council. But the institution with the heaviest load of work is without doubt the ICC. ICSID deals with the narrower field of international investment disputes. UNCITRAL has no administration for arbitrations carried on under its Rules, although, the LCIA and the latest arbitration institution, the WIPO Arbitration Center, offer to rectify the deficiency by providing administration services for parties proceeding under the UNCITRAL Rules. The question posed involves the subsidiary question whether or not the choice of a particular set of Rules really matters. Does it matter whether the Rules adopted for the contract are the ICC, LCIA, ICSID, UNCITRAL, AAA, WIPO, or the other national Rules, like the Swedish Chamber of Commerce, which have gained international recognition? Does it matter whether the arbitration is held in London, Paris, Geneva, New York or Cairo or some other African country? With the increasing business and trade relations between developing countries, what should happen in the case of a South-South business relationship which has turned sour? Where should the aggrieved party turn for the implementation of the intended arbitration?


This content is only available to paid members.

Register Now or sign in
 

Related Discussions

Please sign in or register to post on this forum

 

CB&I
2015-07-30 01:14:58

Applicaple Law

How important is it to keep the same "Applicable Law" as of the main Contract when Subcontracting the work to lower tier Subcontractors. What are the implica...
 
 
 
Replies: 2

Rio Tinto
2015-07-28 21:46:49

Arbitration less popular than litgiation

I am wondering if anyone else has noticed a trend of arbitration becoming less popular than litigation in developed countries where the judicial system is trusted, suc...
 
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 5

Private
2015-06-18 14:13:12

Contract Process

I want to share my company's process at a high level with a couple of things in mind. First, if it helps you, great. I'm happy to do so. Second, I am always looking ...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 6

AIA
2015-05-17 22:11:00

Sanction screening

Is there a sanction screening process for new suppliers?
 
 
 
Replies: 2

KLA-Tencor
2015-03-26 16:17:12

Software click-wrap, click-through

Often employees without signing authority are 'clicking' on software click-wrap, click-through, and/or automatic update agreements (collectively known as 'click-wrap a...
 
 
 
Replies: 2
Anonymous
2015-03-11 10:08:04

Granting IP ownership to a 3rd Party (UK)

Does anyone know the legal position around assigning intellectual property rights to a third party that is not signature to the contract in question?
 
 
 
 
Replies: 3

Hewlett-Packard Co
2015-03-03 16:40:40

Indemnity (only) for Material Breach of an Agreement

Where it was not specified previously, the 'other party' has redlined our SW license agreement to constrain the indemnification they offer us for the use of their soft...
 
 
 
Replies: 2
Anonymous
2015-02-26 09:27:19

Most Favored Nations Clause Validation

Does anyone have any examples of best demonstrated practices related to validating a service supplier's compliance with a standard Most Favored Nations clause.
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 4