Loading...
 
 
 

Small and Medium Businesses / Start-up

 
Options
Network Leads

Small and Medium Businesses / Start-up

This group is intended to be for SMB companies with a small commercial team, including “sole practitioners”. The groups objectives are to develop a culture of commerciality focusing on the needs of SMBs.

What does that mean? It means working with the business to integrate commercial thinking and practice in to the life cycle of the business. It includes

by providing the commercial tools, knowledge and experience by way of training, education and leadership.

It means recognizing the needs of practitioners to be nimble and agile and to not be burdened by commercial procedures that may impede rather than enhance corporate targets. It means making the commercial team a valued and essential function of a business and its success. Considerations of industry, locality etc. are not hugely relevant as the issues faced are cross jurisdictional.

Group Mission/Vision:

Provide its members with insights to new trends and emerging practices in the fields of contracting, commercial and relationship management in the sector, provide general guidance and support to practitioners, and articulate the needs of SMB practitioners within IACCM.

A small and midsize business (SMB) is a business which, due to its size, has different requirements, and often faces different challenges than, large enterprises. Small businesses are usually defined as organizations with fewer than 100 employees; midsize enterprises are those organizations with 100 to 999 employees. OR small business can be defined as organizations with less than $50 million in annual revenue; midsize enterprise is defined as organizations that make more than $50 million, but less than $1 billion in annual revenue.

 
 
Network Updates

10 Pitfalls to Avoid in Contracting

I note that the post is from November 2015. Would you say that the statistics for these 10 have remained the same in 2019? Is it possible to get more information about the survey that was conducted, where did the input come from? For example, what is the 9.2% financial benefit / Erosion based on?

Read More...

IACCM 2019 Benchmark Report

More than 750 organizations participated in IACCM's latest study, which covers all the critical areas of organizational design and performance. Reporting lines, performance measures, role and responsibilities, headcount, sources of learning - these and more are covered with extensive data, analysis, and IACCM observations and commentary. When reviewing the findings, please remember that in many cases they may reflect an average. Where necessary, you may wish to contact us to obtain more precise data applicable to your industry or size of organization. Equally, you may wish to contact us about undertaking a process capability assessment and workshop to assist your improvement journey.

Read More...

Jurisdiction

For Agreement between the Parties of differnet origin , the aurgument starts up on Jurisdiction and governing law for the AGreement. while both the Parties are interested in proposing law of their respective country to be made applicable to the AGreement, I want to know whether there is any list of prioritised or ranked Jurisdiction/ Govering law like World bank ranks each country a ranking for " ease in doing business" and almost 190 countrites are listed. For example, I propose indian law and other Party would prefer Laws of Singpore to be governing law. Can parties choose England and wales as nuetral or any other preferred law.

Read More...
 

Project Performance Management Plan - Validation Request

Hello IACCM Community. I'm here to ask for some good souls who have made progress showing demonstrative progress in improving project outcomes supported by suppliers. I work for a global firm in the IT organization. My role is on a team of 3 that are tasked with supporting contract and relationship management on our largest suppliers. Our Tier 1 list includes suppliers in the Infrastructure domain and suppliers supporting our largely aggregated development and production support services for our global applications. We have a pretty good Project Manager function riding herd on projects (of which the contract delivery is a part) and delivery managers looking at metrics for production support services via our CMDB tool. But since we have fragmented data for projects and somewhat inconsistent contracting approach, and pretty consistent high level failure in the project portfolio, I'm targeting my team to focus on improving this area first as a priority. Developing the approach for this area is my assigned focus area for my global team. Our suppliers have most of the scope for projects and I'm supporting the transition into an outsourcing agreement that seems to be missing some measurement pieces. Inside my organization, I see other gaps to adequately support this transition. I have specific ideas (high level roadmap) but I can't tell if I'm on the right path or just scratching the surface of what a group like mine should be delivering. Is there a group of experts (i.e. people who have tried this and failed and then did it better the next time) that I can talk with or see research that outlines what works in IT project performance across firms that I can look at? Not satisfied with the level of detail available from the firms I expected to be on top of the details of what a 2 year plan looks like. Thanks Much. Kirk Mitchell IT Supplier Management - Americas

Read More...
 
 
 
Network Members