Please sign in or register to continue.
IACCM membership gives you access a wide range of resources and services, including:
Make the most of your contracts and your career. Click below to learn more and upgrade now.
We like to keep our members apprised of the latest innovations in our field. In this webcast, we will hear from three emerging technology start-up companies who showcased their offerings at the IACCM European Conference in April. What are they bringing to the market and what difference will it make? Join us to see what is on the cutting edge.
Dispute management, commercial innovation, managerial contracting, computable contracts and ethics - these were among the hot topics that senior practitioners and international academics debated at IACCM's recent Academic Symposium, hosted by the Leeds University School of Law.
If a buyer awards a call off contract after a framework expires (even though they started sourcing exercise prior to framework expiry), is the call off contract valid?
This article discusses the differences among representations, warranties, and covenants and why they are important.
In this edition, somewhat exceptionally, we feature only one case brought by hundreds of sub-postmaster claimants against the Post Office. This is because of the range of topics covered by the judgment but also because of the potential significance of the case for the drafting and interpretation of commercial contracts if the case is followed by other courts in the future.
We are working on a project whereby the Engineer's tender document had an error in the specification where they listed a part number and a description of the part, however, the 2 were marginally different and we priced according to the part number, which turned out to be the incorrect part. The order of precedence has specifications above drawings; I've confirmed that drawings did not give any indication into the part. The engineer is saying that we ought to have reasonably known there was a conflict in the part number vs the description and the owner does not want to bear the cost for this correction. We have not yet ordered the products nor have we submitted any shop drawings or product sheets. Since the order of precedence isn't going to help here, what has been your experience when there is a conflict between a part number and the description of a part? I can confirm that the contract does not have a precedent of part number vs a description.
We have a contractor for a service and we are looking to part ways with the vendor. The contractor has emailed us and said they are no longer interested in performing the service and we are happy with letting them go. Can this email work as a means to terminate the contract? Also from a legal aspect how do we handle this? Is a simple email back to them sufficient to confirm this termination arrangement? Thanks in advance for your help. Dale
Hi All, I'm interested to know what steps you take when a company notifies you of an acquisition? We get a lot of requests to move the contract and invoices to new entity since the existing contract holder is no longer in a position to pay for services (been absorbed / no longer trading under contracted name). We do our checks to make sure it's a legitimate request so I understand the need to transfer the contract but is there a standard way of dealing with these types of requests to avoid potential risks? I know a novation would not be appropriate as we would be unable to obtain Director signature of a company that no longer exists. What other methods are available? Thanks!
Can anyone offer (without violating NDAs and other confidentiality provisions) a value they use to estimate what payouts might be (%) for claims over a long-running infrastructure project (multiple contractors involved)? Owner seeks values to use as benchmarks and as input to EAC for Project.
If Client ask for a project and delivery put some efforts to develop estimation and submit it to client. Client disapprove the Project. In this case can service provider claim efforts spent on submitting the estimation ?
I work as a Contract Manager for Indirect Procurement. One of our challenges is getting our internal clients to push our templates out to our vendors. We have limited internal data on how quickly one of our templates is approved versus a vendor's template. We are working to get more data to support the use of our templates. How have others addressed this issue at their organziations? Is there some benchmarking data out there that I could look at?
Our company has just released a revised signature policy outlining in detail the proper signatories for our commercial contracts and other agreements. The question has come up whether employees who lack authority to sign under the policy may be subject to personal liability for breach of the contract. I am definitely familiar with Article 3-403 of the UCC, but that deals more with agency and holders in due course rather than employees. Furthermore, I have seen both sections of state statutes and examples of contract sections that deal with personal liability of employees lacking authority to sign in the academic setting. However, I am curious whether anyone can cite specific examples of either (American) state or federal statutory or common law regarding such liability in the commercial or non-academic setting. I thank you very much in advance for your responses.
I am looking for a simple definition of a CONTRACT OWNER. We have a new program and the description is getting bogged down but what a tool needs from the owner, but not what their responsibilities are. Would appreciate any comments!!
Often employees without signing authority are 'clicking' on software click-wrap, click-through, and/or automatic update agreements (collectively known as 'click-wrap agreements' Interested in hearing comments/best practices on managing/negotiating/amending suppliers click-through agreements
Where it was not specified previously, the 'other party' has redlined our SW license agreement to constrain the indemnification they offer us for the use of their software to "material breaches". (We have pretty good warranties in place.) Not having a legal background, I'm wondering what kind of "non-material" breaches (especially regarding SW) should I be concerned about? Thank you!
No new subscribers to this Network
IACCM Networks are collaborative, community driven professional networking sites. Our contributors publish their own content as well as links to third-party articles and websites, and IACCM cannot be held responsible for content posted here. View Content Policy
Content Policy
IACCM cannot guarantee or warrant the accuracy, reliability, currency, completeness or legality of such content, third-party articles, or
linked websites, and disclaim all responsibility for the use of any inaccurate, incomplete or illegal content contained in or linked from IACCM
and disclaim any and all liability to the user for any damages, including without limitation, direct or indirect, special incidental, moral or
consequential damages, loss of profits, opportunities or information or for expenses arising in connection with your use of IACCM, its services,
forums or the site content, even if they (individually or as a group) have been advised of the possibility of such damages, losses or expenses;
do not warrant that IACCM operates error-free, nor that defects, errors or omissions will be corrected, or that IACCM is completely secure;
disclaim any and all warranties of any kind, including but not limited to implied, express or statutory warranties as to non-infringement of
intellectual property rights, or third party rights, title, latent defects, uninterrupted service, merchantability, fitness for a particular
purpose, and freedom from computer viruses; and
do not warrant or guarantee that files available for downloading through IACCM will be free of infections or viruses, worms, Trojan horses or
other code that contains contaminating or destructive properties.
IACCM, including any and all aspects of IACCM, is not a substitute for independent professional advice and users should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances. Users must exercise their own skill and care with respect to their use of IACCM and must carefully evaluate the accuracy, currency, completeness and relevance of the material on the site for their purposes. The user should carefully assess any and all information obtained through IACCM before applying it to the user's situation. Never disregard, avoid or delay in obtaining professional advice about handling engineered or other nanomaterials or nanoparticles because of something you have read on this site. The advice the user finds in IACCM is freely offered in good faith, but no legal liability can be accepted by IACCM, members on IACCM's Implementation Committee, IACCM's operators, content partners, content contributors or providers, or IACCM's sponsors.
IACCM contains links to other Internet sites that are external to IACCM. IACCM takes reasonable care in linking Internet sites but has no direct control over the content of the linked sites, or the changes that may occur to the content on those sites. It is the responsibility of the users to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information contained in linked external Internet sites. Links to external Internet sites, or links to documents, do not constitute an endorsement or a recommendation of any material on those sites, or in those documents, or of any third party products or services offered by, from or through those sites or those documents. Users of links provided by this Internet site are responsible for being aware of which organization hosting the Internet site they visit.
To report any innappropriate content, please
click here.
MENU