Government & Public Sector

Community Updates

IACCM Annual Europe Forum 2015 - London

Join us at the 2015 IACCM Europe Forum! Visit www.iaccm.com/europe for program and speaker details. Pricing Details:*Corporate Member rate includes a 30% discount on the standard Full Member rate Registration Options Individual Member Rate   Corporate Member* Rate   Non-Member Rate (includes 1 year IACCM Membership!) Full Event Pass (Incl. optional Workshops) £1176 inc. VAT £828 inc. VAT £1316 inc. VAT Qualified Academic Pass** (incl. Full event pass) £708 inc. VAT NA £852 inc. VAT *A 30% discount applies to those who are part of an active corporate membership. The discounted price will automatically be listed when you register. If in doubt about your membership status, please contact info@iaccm.com. Contact Diane Kilkenny to learn more about starting a Corporate Membership. **Discounts available to FULL-TIME Academics only, please contact info@iaccm.com for details.


A landmark for contract & commercial management

The launch of the Journal of Strategic Contracting & Negotiation is a momentous event for anyone who cares about the field of contracting. For the first time, there is a dedicated academic journal that will promote and consolidate research in this area.


Payment by results

IACCM recently hosted a roundtable discussion to explore industry attitudes towards contracts based on 'payment by results'. As buyers shift from seeking low price to value for money, it is inevitable that suppliers will be expected to commit more firmly to performance. This typically extends the period of engagement for the supplier and leads to the question 'When should I be paid?' Many buyers - business and consumer - will increasingly expect that value is visible prior to payment, in whole or in part.


Contracts - inhibitor or enabler

Contracts are written to reflect a wide variety of business policies and practices, as well as product or service capabilities. At a time of rapid change, it is inevitable that terms need continuous review and update.


Need-to-Know Facts For SaaS Subscribers and Providers

This presentation provides intersting facts that you may not have known about SAAS, benefits and risks. Did you know the cloud is giving birth to more than 8 out of 10 new software applications? Did you also know that 79% of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) providers do not guarantee application continuity to their subscribers?



Before you acquire mission-critical technology from a third-party software vendor, take a few minutes to review the costs and risks. What will happen to your company if your technology is unavailable? Learn strategies on how you can manage your risk with a technology escrow program. In this report, you will learn: -- How to implement specific escrow strategies to meet your company's individual needs. -- How the experts at Iron Mountain will work with you to simplify the escrow process and make you better prepared. -- How a best practice escrow program can reduce risks and costs to your company by ensuring your technology is available to you when you need it.


Coupa or Ariba

Hi, Which one is better for a Public Sector organization? Can any of these handle Contract Management? Thanks,


social media

We are looking for experiences and recommendations for using social media for procurement in the public sector. Please post a response in this forum or send to rharde@iaccm.com. All comments and suggestions are welcomed. Thanks.


FOIA / EIR in International Contracts

As a government body engaging in international (Gov-to-Gov) trade, what is the position on the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 and Freedom of Information Act 2000? Do the Act and Regs have effect on Clients and Bodies outside the UK? Thanks for your help!


Public versus Private Sector Contracting: A Contrast in Values

IACCM REPORT FINDING: Private sector personnel are almost 80% more likely to be influenced by the need to promote competition and minimize operating costs -Please share your thoughts. Hoping this generates some activity. When I read IACCM article, I was perplexed by the statement above and therefore I offer the following thoughts: In the U.S. public sector procurement is the intersection between three interconnected non-complimentary forces; law, public policy, and industry. Public policy combined with Federal law dictates that competition is the single most important aspect of the U.S. Federal procurement process. In accordance with the law contracting professionals in the U.S. Government are required to consider/ research 7 different socioeconomic categories before they can compete an opportunity in a full and open environment. At each layer acquisition professionals make a business decision about the capability of industry to perform the work at hand for a reasonable price. Contracting professionals are required to do this for simple procurements and large strategically sourced contract vehicles. In fact, at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the initial market research described above has helped create an industry base of 15,000 current contractors 11,000 of which are small and medium sized business. Each year over 3,000 new companies win a contract with the Department. This ensures that the Department has a highly competitive marketplace that is constantly competing to meet mission objectives and win contract awards. Although the Government incurs additional labor costs to perform the market research the cost savings from the robust market place and constant competition is tremendous. Furthermore, the companies that survive in the marketplace have a keen understanding of the mission and how to achieve it at the lowest cost. At DHS, performance metrics include rate of competition on each individual procurement ( 76% in FY 12) and operational cost savings (approximately $330M from strategic sourcing alone). The interesting point here is that the level of competition is so high that contracts tend to be awarded to industry partners that have determined the best way to meet the mission at the lowest cost. This is much different than the goal of helping a corporation maximize shareholder wealth. In the public sector (many times in my experience) we are contracting for services that would normally be an individual company’s competitive advantage. Meaning that many of the contracts we write are to perform a service that many companies would never outsource. The survey results posted above seem to indicate that public sector professionals do not value competition as a way to minimize operating costs. However, I believe public sector procurement professionals value competition just as much and work in a more complex environment that challenges them to think beyond a single value proposition (maximizing shareholder wealth). I am wondering if the way the question is written generated misunderstanding. If not, then I believe we need to resuscitate the discussion around minimizing operating costs and promoting competition to ensure that public sector employees understand how valuable this can be. Thoughts? Jose



Does anyone have or know of a resource that summarizes each of the FAR/DFAR clauses?  I am looking to develop a quick-reference guide that will identify the substantive requirements.  Thanks!

Community Members
Showing subscriptions for the past three days. View all community members
Beiter, William  
Elbit Systems of America
Horwitz, Charles  
3M Company
Thompson, Catherine  
Defence Materiel Organisation (DMO)
Cockerill, Greg  
AAPCM - Australian Association of Pro...
Doe-Lawson, Carl Kofi  
AAPCM - Australian Association of Pro...
Smallman, Linda  
AAPCM - Australian Association of Pro...
Bayley, Kerry  
AAPCM - Australian Association of Pro...
Bondoc, Katrina  
Vision Technology Solutions, LLC
Cohen, Stewart  
Elbit Systems of America
Estes, Weldon  
Elbit Systems of America
Ibarra, Roger  
Elbit Systems of America
Ismail, Nasir  
Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd
Singh, Ravinder  
Nexen Energy ULC