Loading...
 
 

Future contracting: stronger together

Published: 26 Apr 2019 Average Rating: unrated Print
 

Author: Tim Cummins

Big organizations have traditionally seen little need to collaborate. Their size gives them power - power over suppliers, customers, distribution networks, even over government and public policy. When it comes to negotiation, they simply don't do it. Contract terms are imposed on the counter party. Why be reasonable when you can instead exercise control (and call it 'compliance')?

This attitude still exists, but increasingly proves to be outdated. The networked world exposes bullying, reveals secrets and condemns unethical behavior. The forces that drive the modern economy are also driving increased partnering and collaboration. They enable open, streamlined data flows that result in improved speed and quality of decision-making and better business results.

Not just opinion

Many commercial professionals – especially those within IACCM – have recognized the truth of this for years (read, for example, IACCM's annual reports on the Most Negotiated Terms, dating back to 2002). The problem has been how to make the switch.

Yesterday, IACCM partnered with Leeds University Law School to stage an Academic Symposium. While coming from significantly different perspectives, speaker after speaker reinforced the message about cooperation. Lisa Bernstein from Chicago Law School promoted 'managerial contracts'; Haward Soper from Leicester University highlighted the fact that contracts frame relationships; Christof Backhaus from Aston Business School explored cooperation in the context of ethics; and Olivier Goodenough from University of Vermont offered insight to the way that computational contracts will free up time, allowing a shift in the focus of our negotiations.

I could cite many others from this outstanding event – but the important point is that new thinking is fast becoming mainstream. 'Stronger together' is shifting from a mantra to a true movement that will deliver both economic and social benefit. IACCM- along with its fast-growing array of academic partners and industry thought-leaders – is assisting its members to implement the practical approaches that give collaboration meaning – contract design and simplification, relational and performance contracts, research and training. These are truly exciting times!

Discover more by joining us at one of the many IACCM events – conferences, member meetings, webinars.

 
 
 

Related Discussions

Please sign in or register to post on this forum
Anonymous
2018-10-12 14:32:00

COLLABORATION AND TEAM ROLES

A great article. Roles and responsibilities are often overlooked. We instead, as a buying organisation, like to define how something should be delivered.
 
 
 
Replies: 2

Alstom
2016-12-01 06:07:29

Evaluating Warranty extension cost

In an EPC project, the project is delayed by employer and employer requests contractor to extend warranty. Employer agrees to provide a claim/ amendment for warranty e...
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 4

Legal Aid Agency / Ministry of Justice
2016-06-18 10:14:08

Contract management - highest growth inducties & areas?

Hi I've just viewed the 'untangling complex projects' webinar which refers to a significant increase in contract management roles globally. Which industries and geogra...
 
 
 
Replies: 2
Anonymous
2015-03-25 09:02:50

Work Order and Change Order

We have a SOW and spend defined over 2 years, as defined in contract we raise Work Order for specific work. If somebody can help why do we need Work Oder, why cant we ...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 7

Schlumberger India
2017-01-13 06:46:58

Payment Default by Customer

Even after having Payment Terms as XX days, at times Customer is not paying as per agreed payment cycle time. What are all the methods we can use to expedite the Cus...
 
 
 
Replies: 2

Schlumberger India
2016-12-13 04:21:00

Digital Security Clause

We have been asked by our client to comply with the "Digital Security" clause of the contract which is based on ISO 27002. I would like to understand about ...
 
 
Older entries »
Replies: 1