Loading...
 
 

Better Procurement: Platform vs. Panel

Published: 28 May 2019 Average Rating: unrated Print
 

Author: Tim Cummins

The use of 'supplier panels' is relatively widespread in modern procurement, especially in categories such as professional services. The concept behind them is that they bring greater speed and efficiency to supplier selection and - in theory - reduce costs. In practice, some argue, they undermine value, stifle innovation, threaten integrity and more likely increase costs.

Concept and reality

The idea behind supplier panels is to reduce the complexity of managing multiple suppliers. It supports increased compliance by limiting choice. In theory, it may generate lower negotiated rates.

In practice, panels tend to include only the larger, multi-capability providers, since otherwise competitive tension is lost. These providers are typically the most expensive and frequently the least creative; creativity is more normally associated with smaller niche organizations that specialise in specific fields. These organizations also run with much lower overheads and much greater flexibility in winning business.

Panels not only limit the flow of new ideas, they also reduce the likelihood of challenge. For example, a recent report suggested that legal advice may be compromised because panel members become more concerned about maintaining their position than they are about honest (but perhaps uncomfortable) advice to their client. Similar concerns arise with regard to the bigger consultancies and audit firms, frequently accused of lacking objectivity or failing to ask tough questions.

An alternative

So if not panels, how should organizations manage the market? The answer could be through platforms. Just as the Cloud is opening up the choice of software applications, so Cloud-based platforms, powered by artificial intelligence, can offer access to a host of suppliers – without the complexity of the past. Platform providers such as Globality and Tradeshift are taking much of the hard work and risk out of market management, going beyond the services of a provider like Amazon by overseeing key areas of compliance and quality. 

So which will win, or is there room for both? My bet would be on platforms.

 
 
 

Related Discussions

Please sign in or register to post on this forum

PRS for Music
2019-06-13 09:28:40

Customer survey

Hi, my colleagues and I are putting together a survey for our stakeholders and suppliers. the Objective is to gauge the standard of service and engagement and identify...
 
 
Replies: 1

Mobily
2019-06-13 06:49:19

Procurement and Purchasing

Hi all, Can we have a clear explanation for the differences between the terms of Procurement and Purchasing, and also the right position of the Supply Chain, is it a p...
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 4
Anonymous
2019-04-28 18:48:18

Software as a Service SaaS

Hello I am new to IT purchases. Do you have any experience with SaaS? What should I be aware of as a Buyer? Judit
 
 
Replies: 1

Bahrain National Gas Co. (B.S.C)
2019-04-25 11:24:29

Contract Agreement

We are in a debate within the organization that I work for and that is - whether it is a good (or best) practice to always execute a Contract Agreement (signed by both...
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 4

AD Supply Chain Group Pty Ltd
2019-01-23 05:59:57

Blockchain Smart Contracts

I came across aeternity which is a blockchain based contracting platform (https://www.aeternity.com/). It proposes that a contract is deemed complete and payments rel...
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 4