Supplier-led innovation: fact or fantasy?

Published: 19 Aug 2019 Average Rating: unrated Print

Author: Tim Cummins

At present, supplier-led innovation appears to be more fantasy than fact. That's the conclusion we must draw from an IACCM Research report, published last week. It shows a significant divide between the aspirations expressed by buyers and the reality experienced by suppliers.

What's going wrong?

There is wide agreement that supplier-led innovation is both possible and desirable. There are, of course, some great examples of it occurring. But it is the exception rather than the norm, in spite of the efforts of many customers who insert 'innovation clauses' into their contract, in the rather forlorn hope that this may cause something to happen.

Part of the problem is that 'innovation' is frequently not well defined. For example, is it innovation at a global level, or within an industry, or just in the context of the specific customer? And how does 'innovation' differ from 'continuous improvement'?

However, more severe than this issue is the fact that most organizations have not established any form of innovation process or protocol. There isn't a formal structure for review or to generate funding or to determine how risks and benefits will be shared. This is a source of frustration for many suppliers, who feel there is no avenue for ideas to be proposed and evaluated.

Innovation needs trust

Finally, there is also a significant trust barrier. However much Procurement groups may claim they have changed, the experience of most suppliers is that bid selection processes remain dominated by lowest price and risk allocation. Quite simply, they do not trust the underlying integrity and sense of fairness in many of their customers. In those where trust prevails, innovation flourishes.

The IACCM report, compiled through surveys and interviews and authored by a group of academics and practitioners, provides guidance and methodology to those who really seek supplier-led innovation. It happens, but only when the environment is right.


Related Discussions

Please sign in or register to post on this forum
2020-03-11 05:47:57

FM Event - Foreseeability

Can someone please clarify for me: Australian Jurisdiction Where, in a FM clause, it defines an event which does not constitute Force Majeure as "any circumst...
Replies: 3
2019-07-28 06:49:22


For Agreement between the Parties of differnet origin , the aurgument starts up on Jurisdiction and governing law for the AGreement. while both the Parties are interes...
Replies: 4
2018-10-12 14:32:00


A great article. Roles and responsibilities are often overlooked. We instead, as a buying organisation, like to define how something should be delivered.
Replies: 3

Worley Engineering
2018-09-18 09:34:19

How to handle a dominating client?

Thanks for the interesting article. From my experience, i've encountered number of client who likes to dominate the contract administration and project execution ...
Replies: 1

Phillips 66
2017-02-01 14:50:15

Supplier Management "best practices"

We're starting some work around Supplier Management and Performance Management and looking for any information from others around best practices you have at your compa...
Replies: 3

Ace Hardware
2015-03-27 12:12:33


I work as a Contract Manager for Indirect Procurement. One of our challenges is getting our internal clients to push our templates out to our vendors. We have limite...
Replies: 6

APM Group
2014-09-14 13:08:25

Recent UK Legal chnages

I was told recently about a change to UK Law affecting contracts and the length of time and the quantity of evidence that had to be retained as a result. Please can s...
Replies: 3

BAE Systems
2018-01-25 22:36:36

Sub Contract Programme Management

Hi - I work for a global Aerospace & Defence company and am based in the UK. We have found it very difficult to source Sub Contract Programme Managers; we are now ...
Older entries »
Replies: 4