'Contract Management is more important than Procurement'

Published: 09 Oct 2019 Average Rating: 4.9 / 5 Print

Author: Tim Cummins

This quote, taken from the latest edition of Supply Management magazine, will be welcomed by many as recognition that it's actually the results of an acquisition that matters. For too long, they will say, Procurement has been happy to oversee inputs, ignoring the fact that it is contract management that oversees outputs and the actual delivery of value.

I have never forgotten the words of one very senior executive who recognized this issue when he observed that “organizations frequently undertake a perfect procurement and achieve completely the wrong outcome”. He understood that 'procurement' is actually just one element of a much bigger process.

Many contribute to disappointing results

There can be little question that traditional procurement practices are increasingly misaligned with business interests and have not adjusted to the realities of today's markets. However, it would not be fair to heap the blame for that onto Procurement functions. They do what they are told and trained to do. Well-managed procurements are frequently let down by others – for example, Legal providing inappropriate templates, the CFO demanding draconian savings, the business unit failing to manage supplier performance. If Procurement has failed, it is a failure of its leadership to challenge and be adequately vocal in pushing for change. In this, they have often been let down by external experts – the consultants, advisory firms and training organizations that should be assisting in preparing their teams and processes for the future but instead have focused on issues like compliance, commoditization and category management. Procurement has been led down far too many blind alleys.

Where IACCM enters the picture

The International Association for Contract & Commercial Management was founded precisely because of these chronic issues. Procurement – like Sales – is just one of many specialist disciplines. 'Contracting' is an overarching competence and capability. It needs ownership. When it's left to chance, things go wrong. Often badly wrong.

For 20 years, IACCM has worked to overcome entrenched attitudes and innate resistance to change. During this time, it has directly engaged with and trained over 200,000 people who understood there must be a better way. Its research, training and advisory services have enabled massive progress for the organizations which have grasped the fundamental truth that customers and suppliers depend on each other for success and are working to develop open, cooperative relationships, founded on honesty and integrity. IACCM espouses collaboration and believes in inclusive behaviors that generate mutual, shared benefits for customers and their suppliers.

In the end, does this mean that contract management is 'more important' than Procurement? No, it doesn't. They are different disciplines and they must complement each other. What is true – and the real issue here – is that both are subservient to the overarching 'contracting process' and must align with commercial goals and strategies. Unless there is focus on holistic development of commercial capability, simply changing names or expanding the Procurement remit delivers at best marginal improvements and could even make things worse.

IACCM's recent benchmarking report provides insight to the current state of contract and commercial management organization and performance, highlighting also the leading practises that generate improved results.


Related Discussions

Please sign in or register to post on this forum

PRS for Music
2019-06-13 09:28:40

Customer survey

Hi, my colleagues and I are putting together a survey for our stakeholders and suppliers. the Objective is to gauge the standard of service and engagement and identify...
Replies: 1

2019-06-13 06:49:19

Procurement and Purchasing

Hi all, Can we have a clear explanation for the differences between the terms of Procurement and Purchasing, and also the right position of the Supply Chain, is it a p...
Replies: 4
2018-01-24 05:57:07

On boarding of vendors for As a Service offering

Hi There, does anyone have a governance /framework for on boarding "as a service" vendors ? What stand outs that are different compared to the "normal&q...
Replies: 2

Phillips 66
2017-02-01 14:50:15

Supplier Management "best practices"

We're starting some work around Supplier Management and Performance Management and looking for any information from others around best practices you have at your compa...
Replies: 3

Premera Blue Cross
2015-04-01 12:59:07

Vendor Survey

When conducting a Vendor Survey, do you recommend being market specific or on all vendors that your team manages? I would like to get some ideas of what other companie...
Replies: 2

2015-07-15 06:39:54

EPC contracts. Progressive Lump Sum / Contratos tipo EPC. Ajuste Alzado Progresivo

Hello, Do you have a contract model of EPC Progressive Lump Sum contracts you can share with me? I would really appreciate your help. Tienes un modelo de Contratos ...
Replies: 4

2015-01-08 07:41:29

Development of a Supply Chain Category covering Construction services

One of my objectives for this year 2015 is the launching of a Supply Chain Category which would be called "Facilities execution services" or just "Const...
Replies: 5

2016-06-01 14:55:31

Flowdowns from Prime Contracts

Does anyone have a "best practice" for including Prime Contract flowdowns to subconsultants? Some companies affix the entire agreement; some extract relevant...
Replies: 12

Surrey and Sussex county councils
2017-05-22 09:45:50

Supplier Contract segmentation

Is anybody aware of any dynamic tools for contract segmentation ? What I am trying to achieve is to segment my contracts by the normal risk, complexity, value etc but...
Older entries »
Replies: 2