Organization and reporting line are distractions

Published: 04 Nov 2014 Average Rating: 3.9 / 5 Print

Author: Tim Cummins

One of the questions asked most commonly by contracts and commercial groups is how they should be organized and where they should report. These are not the right questions. The fact they are asked so frequently is in fact an indicator of the real problem - which is lack of clarity over purpose and goals.

It is in a way ironic that the biggest cause of lost value in contract management is disagreement over scope and goals. This is precisely the issue that ails many contracts and commercial groups. No one is quite sure of their purpose, or there are widely divergent opinions. This leads some executives to perceive no value at all, while others will have quite varied views and expectations. This inevitably means the function will disappoint many in its contribution or achievements.

In a recent IACCM workshop we provided four options regarding the primary value that comes from effective contract management. These were related to risk and opportunity; reputation and trust; revenue and profit; and operations and performance. We know, in reality, that high performing contract management processes contribute significantly to all these things. But the problem is that few executives see contract management as a process; in consequence, the debate over organization is generally focused on a much narrower area of value delivery – typically associated with either control and compliance, or with assisting business units to work around controls in a managed way. The workshop resulted in lively and healthy debate, leading to much greater understanding of the potential benefits and a refreshing discussion on what this might mean to the way contracts are formed, drafted and communicated within the business.

The start point for any business activity should be a clarity over its purpose and value. From this flows a definition of process, measurements and the skills or knowledge required for performance. Then – and only then – can there be meaningful discussion over the size, nature and reporting line of any associated group or function. A failure to follow this approach results in confusion, regular change and lack of investment – and hence the regularly recurring question 'How should we be organized and where should we report?'

To gain respect and status, contracts and commercial groups need to rise above these organizational questions and challenge senior management with the much more fundamental question regarding their potential purpose and value. The good news is that IACCM offers extensive data to illustrate how substantial that contribution can be, if only management addresses the core issue of investing in a business competence.


Comment or read more of Tim's blog


Related Discussions

Please sign in or register to post on this forum
2015-01-27 10:15:01

What is Your Agenda or Contention with Contract Management

The above bullet points are currently a source of contention in the corporate office. The problem is that those that do not have a day-to-day touch point do not under...
Replies: 4

2019-06-13 06:49:19

Procurement and Purchasing

Hi all, Can we have a clear explanation for the differences between the terms of Procurement and Purchasing, and also the right position of the Supply Chain, is it a p...
Replies: 4

Allianz Technology
2017-06-06 07:06:35

Performance of Contract Management

I'm curious to get inputs about the performance assessment of contract management. While other roles have defined metrics (for instance, procurement roles can be meas...
Replies: 3
2016-07-11 02:02:35

disadvantages of Pass-through Cost

Can anyone tell me the disadvantages of having more than 50-60% Pass-through Cost when a company is executing a ERP implementation project and is acting as system inte...
Replies: 3

2019-12-17 11:22:11

Agenda 2030 and public procurement driving it

Lately, I have come across strong initiatives in the Nordic countries that intend to drive Agenda 2030 and all it´s goals by embedding the content within the public pr...
Replies: 2

2019-10-16 23:31:01

Pros and Cons about where Contract Management fits in an organization (e.g., Legal? Procurement? Finance? the Business?)

Hi everyone. I am looking for some thoughts / collateral concerning where does the Contract management group best fit in a firm? I know of one company where it is in...
Replies: 4

2019-09-22 10:42:18

Resource Planning Tool for Contracts Teams

Currently reviewing the different techniques of developing a contracts team resourcing plan that caters for number of contracts, the complexity of contracts, budget al...
Replies: 1

Pretorius Consulting
2019-09-18 17:50:21

Pricing Article Changes

Does anyone actually price changes to the Articles of the contract? For example, changing the venue for arbitration (5% of the contract value) or the change order pro...
Replies: 2

Pretorius Consulting
2019-09-18 17:43:44

10 Pitfalls to Avoid in Contracting

I note that the post is from November 2015. Would you say that the statistics for these 10 have remained the same in 2019? Is it possible to get more information abo...
Replies: 2

PRS for Music
2019-06-13 09:28:40

Customer survey

Hi, my colleagues and I are putting together a survey for our stakeholders and suppliers. the Objective is to gauge the standard of service and engagement and identify...
Older entries »
Replies: 1