Loading...
 
 

Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) trumps unwritten intent

Published: 17 Mar 2015 Average Rating: 1 / 5 Print
 

Author: Christopher W. Carmichael

Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) states the written terms of a contract can override the opposing party's differing understanding under the right circumstances.

Mark Twain said:

I have signed a lot of contracts in my time, and at sometime I probably knew what the contracts meant, but six months later everything had grown dim and I could be certain of only two things, to wit:

One, I didn't sign any contract.  

Two, the contract means the opposite of what it says.

Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code & unwritten intent

Twain's second comment is true to real life even today.  Invariably, when a deal goes sour, one party claims the contract means something other than what is says.   This is usually followed by an attempt to submit extrinsic evidence to supplement or change the agreement.  But, Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which applies to all contracts for the sale of goods, prohibits the use of extrinsic evidence where the parties provide for a fully integrated contract, as the Seventh Circuit recently explained.

Seventh Circuit enforces the contract as written

In Druckzentrum Harry Jung GmbH & Co. KG v. Motorola Mobility, LLC, 774 F.3d 410 (December 18, 2014) the Seventh Circuit, provided a reminder that, at least under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, a contract is the final written expression of the parties rights and responsibilities when the parties say it does.  The contract in Druckzentrum contained a clause stating that the contract was the entire understanding of the parties and supersede everything else.  Yet, Druckzentrum sought to use outside evidence to show that the parties intended there would be exclusivity, even though the contract contained no promise of exclusivity. 

The Seventh Circuit, in applying Article 2, explained that § 2-202 precludes the use of outside evidence to explain or supplement the contract.  To overcome the prohibition in § 2-202, Druckzentrum argued that the exception in § 2-202(b), which allows evidence of consistent additional terms, allowed Druckzentrum to submit outside evidence about the intent for exclusivity.  The Seventh Circuit, however, noted that the exception in § 2-202(b) does not apply if the contract is fully integrated. 

Druckzentrum, trying to fit within the exception, argued that the agreement could not be fully integrated because it incorporated other documents.  But, as the Seventh Circuit explained, the fact that the contract specifically incorporated certain documents, necessarily excluded any others not mentioned.  Thus, Druckzentrum could not overcome the integration clause.  The contract was enforced as written and Druckzentrum lost on summary judgment. 

Takeaway - Remember that application of Article 2 can lead to a different outcome than the common law

Although some of the phraseology in Article 2 may vary slightly from state to state, the critical provisions of the code are mostly uniform throughout the nation.  Hence, the Seventh Circuit's ruling is helpful guidance for all contracts for the sale of goods, and a reminder of how the UCC can create different outcomes than the common law.          

 

Christopher W. Carmichael

Christopher W. Carmichael

Holland & Knight

http://www.hklaw.com/Christopher-Carmichael/

Christopher W. Carmichael is a partner in Holland & Knight's Chicago office, concentrating on commercial disputes and appeals.

 
 
 

Related Discussions

Please sign in or register to post on this forum

Clarivate
2020-07-29 23:12:10

Contract Forgery and other Fraud (Sell-side POV) - What preventive controls do you have in place and does your organization allow sellers to send contracts to customers directly for signature/review

Hello Folks: We have a number of processes in place to present various types of contract fraud for example customer forgery or side letters which we do not tolerate....
 
 
Replies: 1

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)
2020-07-23 17:00:15

Shared Services Terms & Conditions

Can someone please let me know what terms & conditions should be included in the contract with the Customer for Shared Services Model which will protect both Custo...
 
 
 
 
Replies: 3
Anonymous
2020-06-04 22:31:40

Unlimited liability for data breach

Hi All- Looking for some help in drafting liability clause from Service Provider's side. We are in process of renewing a contract, wherein we have an unlimited Liabili...
 
 
Replies: 1

Sopra Steria
2017-07-10 08:37:16

Agreeing KPI's Reterospectively

Dear All, I'd welcome any suggestions for this situation from the creative minds out there. We are contracting with a software vendor who have proposed a set of perf...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 8

Avon Cosmetics Ltd
2020-08-03 17:04:51

Outcome based commercial model

Hi, we're looking to evolve one of our outsourcing contracts from traditional FTE's governed by SLA's to outcome based contract and metrics. Does anyone...
 
 
 
 
 
 
Replies: 5
Anonymous
2020-07-14 14:30:44

Rwandan law for an IT contract

Hello everyone, my European client is being asked by their Rwandan customer to agree a sales contract governed by Rwandan law. We are used to working with English and...
 
 
 
Older entries »
Replies: 2